And I disagree with your comment that people will abandon VidBlaster in favor of Wirecast. But that does not make this version of VidBlaster "awful," it just makes it incomplete.
Was it a mistake to release an official V3 now? Maybe.
No need to wait for a major version release to get access to these great features. These features might be released in the very next beta. And I would expect that this, too, is in the works.Īnd here's one of the beautiful things about VidBlaster. This feature will be awesome AND worth waiting for.ĭoes the Recorder module need additional file format and bit rate options? Of course. Timed and scheduled playout of videos and audio files gives the user the ability to run a TV or radio station from their PC. Playlist will return, but in the form of the Playout module. I am currently using V3.14, the official release of V3, with no issues and enjoying much more CPU headroom than ever before. I use (and have used) V3 since its first public beta. Not having the Recorder module file format choices in V3 means that users needing this feature will delay their V3 update. But Version 2 has the Playlist and it is readily available for folks that need that feature.
#VIDBLASTER CAMERAS DISPLAY MENU UPGRADE#
Not having a Playlist module in V3 means that many licensed users will choose to not to upgrade at this time. It shows dramatic improvements in CPU utilization, several modules re-written to optimize performance (Camera, Streamer, Recorder, Player), and, for sports broadcasters, adds the Instant Replay Playlist module. On the contrary, Version 3 is a huge step forward in the ongoing improvement of VidBlaster. Yes, version 3 is missing the Playlist, and the Recorder is missing some of the familiar file formats, but that in no way means Version 3 is "awful." you appear to be parroting my comments about version 3 from my July 17th show (link below).
0 kommentar(er)
